This HTML5 document contains 40 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
wdthttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/
wdtnhttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct-normalized/
schemahttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
wikibasehttp://wikiba.se/ontology#
phttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/
n11http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n9http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/reference/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wdshttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/statement/
wdhttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/

Statements

Subject Item
wd:Q69463470
rdf:type
wikibase:Item
schema:description
artículu científicu espublizáu n'avientu de 1987 wetenschappelijk artikel наукова стаття, опублікована в грудні 1987 scientific article published on 01 December 1987 im Dezember 1987 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel
p:P577
wds:Q69463470-6454506E-AE41-4A40-82F4-7DD450DD1BD8
wdt:P577
1987-12-01T00:00:00Z
p:P2093
wds:Q69463470-988C4584-FECA-460A-8214-10FD5BF67FB7 wds:Q69463470-4BA86172-48B7-404A-94A0-014A5A6701AF wds:Q69463470-FA075D9E-E6D0-4393-8507-2A6DEF5C4B25 wds:Q69463470-A2116FED-F1CD-4D95-A91C-5CEC4AD6FBD9
wdt:P2093
MacKenzie CR Ales KL Simon R Charlson ME
rdfs:label
Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods? Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods?
skos:prefLabel
Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods? Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods?
schema:name
Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods? Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods?
p:P1476
wds:Q69463470-F38830F0-632B-4F23-A0A2-B75D0F631A26
wdt:P1476
Why predictive indexes perform less well in validation studies. Is it magic or methods?
p:P304
wds:Q69463470-997DD513-D5E8-41E7-A8E0-310AEC193938
wdt:P304
2155-2161
p:P31
wds:Q69463470-D6B0DE00-10F7-465C-8F20-C317C67E1897
wdt:P31
wd:Q13442814
p:P698
wds:Q69463470-68394891-35E9-48DB-B301-2A0645D8F1F9
wdtn:P698
n9:3689067
wdt:P698
3689067
p:P1433
wds:Q69463470-558E6771-E60A-4401-BFBC-6AA26D5BC2F0
wdt:P1433
wd:Q177428
p:P433
wds:Q69463470-745F5B35-BEB6-48D6-87B5-49076DA336A8
p:P478
wds:Q69463470-270AEBF0-D86F-4F7C-BD66-3A381C0934E8
wdt:P433
12
wdt:P478
147
p:P356
wds:Q69463470-2242C39A-217D-4427-A358-BD07FBCD2944
wdtn:P356
n11:ARCHINTE.1987.00370120091016
wdt:P356
10.1001/ARCHINTE.1987.00370120091016