This HTML5 document contains 105 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
wdthttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/
wdtnhttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct-normalized/
schemahttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
wikibasehttp://wikiba.se/ontology#
phttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n12http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/
n11http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/reference/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wdshttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/statement/
wdhttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/

Statements

Subject Item
wd:Q47956750
rdf:type
wikibase:Item
schema:description
artigo científico vetenskaplig artikel article scientific 2017年學術文章 мақолаи илмӣ wetenschappelijk artikel vitskapeleg artikkel 2017年學術文章 artículo científico publicado en 2017 scienca artikolo 2017年学术文章 2017年学术文章 articolo scientifico tudományos cikk naučni članak 2017年學術文章 artigo científico научни чланак научни чланак מאמר מדעי 2017년 논문 2017 nî lūn-bûn bài báo khoa học article científic научна статия videnskabelig artikel vědecký článek bilimsel makale 2017年學術文章 artikel ilmiah artikulong pang-agham 2017年學術文章 2017年学术文章 επιστημονικό άρθρο სამეცნიერო სტატია artigo científico wissenschaftlicher Artikel 2017年学术文章 scientific article published on 28 February 2017 artículu científicu artykuł naukowy наукова стаття, опублікована в лютому 2017 مقالة علمية نشرت في 28 فبراير 2017 articol științific tieteellinen artikkeli vitenskapelig artikkel บทความทางวิทยาศาสตร์ ২৮ ফেব্রুয়ারি ২০১৭-এ প্রকাশিত বৈজ্ঞানিক নিবন্ধ scientific article published on 28 February 2017 2017年学术文章 2017年学术文章 artikull shkencor article scientifique 2017年の論文 vedecký článok teaduslik artikkel научная статья scientific article published on 28 February 2017
p:P577
wds:Q47956750-9669B6DC-D559-4AAD-87E3-A3D90F12EDD3
wdt:P577
2017-02-28T00:00:00Z
p:P2860
wds:Q47956750-43E1C119-B90C-4852-AA86-17B99501F0C5 wds:Q47956750-34BA08C3-64BF-4206-B7F3-7856A717E621 wds:Q47956750-4E863BAD-0755-4B5E-A1F7-062AFE243C5A wds:Q47956750-441BA3B1-932F-491C-A855-DC68FA081E54 wds:Q47956750-660C9F96-46FC-46A9-9869-44A4DBB74758 wds:Q47956750-A2AFE206-F331-4AEA-AD16-0ACF843BBE68 wds:Q47956750-C3BCCDB8-2598-4564-8148-846D0DAF7ADA wds:Q47956750-FEC67D51-A05F-4879-9405-AC4D5E8C640C
wdt:P2860
wd:Q34614588 wd:Q41106848 wd:Q29303758 wd:Q51937895 wd:Q57831036 wd:Q57303147 wd:Q57072861 wd:Q35063278
p:P2093
wds:Q47956750-6EEEEFDA-A2C4-4384-833B-9053E97C6194
wdt:P2093
Thomas Boyer-Kassem
rdfs:label
Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent? Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent?
skos:prefLabel
Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent? Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent?
schema:name
Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent? Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent?
p:P1476
wds:Q47956750-B53B914C-B026-4743-B7DB-8FE34590FF51
wdt:P1476
Is the Precautionary Principle Really Incoherent?
p:P304
wds:Q47956750-7D1FC953-3008-4090-97CF-AE36A7660931
wdt:P304
2026-2034
p:P31
wds:Q47956750-D99ABC0E-254D-4437-9999-6571E4206A22
wdt:P31
wd:Q13442814
p:P921
wds:Q47956750-89B4546B-9C4F-4DB2-90EC-72A349446AAD
wdt:P921
wd:Q515255
p:P698
wds:Q47956750-9AE184E3-1536-4A0A-9A6B-F887DEBCE8F9
wdtn:P698
n11:28244116
wdt:P698
28244116
p:P1433
wds:Q47956750-CAE66AFB-1D04-4859-81BE-8E4D64C44223
wdt:P1433
wd:Q7336230
p:P433
wds:Q47956750-C2FD7FC7-685C-4EE0-98FB-9FBE801A5A39
p:P478
wds:Q47956750-7A5A6449-C2F0-4951-B8A2-5156EDA0ED08
wdt:P433
11
wdt:P478
37
p:P356
wds:Q47956750-616CA561-6D33-4258-87A8-860A1115A415
wdtn:P356
n12:RISA.12774
wdt:P356
10.1111/RISA.12774