This HTML5 document contains 133 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
wdthttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/
wdtnhttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct-normalized/
schemahttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
n12http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
wikibasehttp://wikiba.se/ontology#
phttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n11http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/reference/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wdshttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/statement/
wdhttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/

Statements

Subject Item
wd:Q47595823
rdf:type
wikibase:Item
schema:description
vetenskaplig artikel vedecký článok 2017年學術文章 2017年学术文章 мақолаи илмӣ artykuł naukowy vědecký článek научная статья научни чланак мақолаи илмӣ bài báo khoa học 2017년 논문 2017 nî lūn-bûn wetenschappelijk artikel wissenschaftlicher Artikel tieteellinen artikkeli article scientifique (publié 2017) научни чланак artikulong pang-agham наукова стаття, опублікована в жовтні 2017 επιστημονικό άρθρο artigo científico (publicado na 2017) ২০১৭-এ প্রকাশিত বৈজ্ঞানিক নিবন্ধ مقالهٔ علمی سائنسی مضمون videnskabelig artikel (udgivet 2017) מאמר מדעי artigo científico (publicado na 2017) vitenskapelig artikkel 2017年學術文章 2017年学术文章 2017年學術文章 2017年の論文 articolo scientifico scienca artikolo 2017年学术文章 tudományos cikk bilimsel makale artículo científico publicado en 2017 scientific article სამეცნიერო სტატია artículu científicu 2017年學術文章 article científic научна статия บทความทางวิทยาศาสตร์ vitskapeleg artikkel mokslinis straipsnis 2017年学术文章 artigo científico գիտական հոդված naučni članak articol științific teaduslik artikkel مقالة علمية artikull shkencor article scientific 2017年學術文章 2017年学术文章 2017年學術文章
p:P577
wds:Q47595823-3D3294B4-7335-4EDE-B2F1-D7EEF19FFD8D
wdt:P577
2017-10-15T00:00:00Z
p:P2860
wds:Q47595823-CAD7739C-413C-4743-A6E2-16DE9E01585E wds:Q47595823-B6AEE0B5-C044-4D68-88E2-8369383A21F2 wds:Q47595823-D171F8DA-E15B-412A-8384-8AC1F5E63AF3 wds:Q47595823-960BD2DB-3DB1-4661-A3E5-54EAD78941E7 wds:Q47595823-A005E588-4470-4EC9-A0C0-3812E7A55B22 wds:Q47595823-763E1FE7-4EB5-42B4-BAE5-E33DE1ECA310 wds:Q47595823-694285D4-E162-46D8-A507-8C7192D45076 wds:Q47595823-59536B96-4DB2-4BE8-BC63-21BB9AC25F85 wds:Q47595823-57B224D3-FF7C-428F-9521-4798A0E80AD0 wds:Q47595823-649712F4-1E8B-498E-AF49-0BEC873538CC wds:Q47595823-63615E57-0BE6-476E-A5D1-F4CF78D3B6D1 wds:Q47595823-559F42E7-EBE6-4C24-82D9-4A9121A73A0A wds:Q47595823-29F80DB4-35DE-46AD-946E-CBE78625B8FA wds:Q47595823-3A736C3C-12A4-4EBB-9872-100D90788C12 wds:Q47595823-15B30FF6-2CCF-4941-AB75-1C80E193189F wds:Q47595823-0CF7D5AE-4F5A-42F3-A7C4-440C27BE464B wds:Q47595823-2204425C-A6E2-482E-A68D-EA8F9E4A99C9 wds:Q47595823-0A587D08-8C89-4D56-8D11-A7149D8F4C83 wds:Q47595823-0347EB46-B230-4489-B5DD-2B968CCF0436
wdt:P2860
wd:Q46240815 wd:Q34066309 wd:Q68919383 wd:Q73854439 wd:Q41210375 wd:Q28207337 wd:Q33990708 wd:Q34057003 wd:Q46592028 wd:Q38876794 wd:Q28076857 wd:Q41930322 wd:Q34050549 wd:Q42082559 wd:Q28272259 wd:Q44169830 wd:Q21261935 wd:Q48822011 wd:Q42213061
p:P2093
wds:Q47595823-1A3E767C-041C-4C5B-9F5F-94D77E1640E4 wds:Q47595823-79A931FF-2040-4371-9658-AAEB38EF1F38 wds:Q47595823-5385AAD6-5B1B-4361-A8F3-34FB44EBBF66 wds:Q47595823-D38FCAA9-8421-433F-9DDA-92E37C380162
wdt:P2093
Ravi Kanth Velagapudi Emad Abu Sitta Abed Kanzy Maneesh Gaddam
rdfs:label
Two gaps too many, three clues too few? Do elevated osmolal and anion gaps with crystalluria always mean ethylene glycol poisoning? Two gaps too many, three clues too few? Do elevated osmolal and anion gaps with crystalluria always mean ethylene glycol poisoning?
skos:prefLabel
Two gaps too many, three clues too few? Do elevated osmolal and anion gaps with crystalluria always mean ethylene glycol poisoning? Two gaps too many, three clues too few? Do elevated osmolal and anion gaps with crystalluria always mean ethylene glycol poisoning?
schema:name
Two gaps too many, three clues too few? Do elevated osmolal and anion gaps with crystalluria always mean ethylene glycol poisoning? Two gaps too many, three clues too few? Do elevated osmolal and anion gaps with crystalluria always mean ethylene glycol poisoning?
p:P1476
wds:Q47595823-9EBC41DF-2F8A-4715-8B8B-58BF8CE30B2E
wdt:P1476
Two gaps too many, three clues too few? Do elevated osmolal and anion gaps with crystalluria always mean ethylene glycol poisoning?
p:P31
wds:Q47595823-2C21CD5C-C4EA-4075-8EDD-A9C6F4E25D75 wds:Q47595823-8af2e65d-e462-427c-84b1-af143963fb7b
wdt:P31
wd:Q2782326 wd:Q13442814
p:P698
wds:Q47595823-F7D88BE3-ED83-414E-BCB5-0B00E08A812E
wdtn:P698
n11:29038192
wdt:P698
29038192
p:P1433
wds:Q47595823-4A20454A-1441-41FB-8034-67D37B3E2390
wdt:P1433
wd:Q27723081
p:P478
wds:Q47595823-0085D6D2-F65C-4B25-AE38-37D3BCB58A42
wdt:P478
2017
p:P356
wds:Q47595823-4DDEB2E3-CBA0-406C-9A0C-EDD7A5E3EC23
wdtn:P356
n12:BCR-2017-221739
wdt:P356
10.1136/BCR-2017-221739
p:P932
wds:Q47595823-9E1E28A6-45B9-4CEA-A745-CB0D40A3C98F
wdt:P932
5652656