This HTML5 document contains 126 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
wdthttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/
wdtnhttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct-normalized/
schemahttp://schema.org/
skoshttp://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n10http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
wikibasehttp://wikiba.se/ontology#
phttp://www.wikidata.org/prop/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n11http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/reference/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wdshttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/statement/
n12https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/
wdhttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/

Statements

Subject Item
wd:Q39193789
rdf:type
wikibase:Item
schema:description
2016年論文 naučni članak artigo científico article scientific bài báo khoa học مقالة علمية نشرت في 31 مايو 2016 tudományos cikk wetenschappelijk artikel artigo científico 2016年论文 2016 nî lūn-bûn article científic scientific article published on 31 May 2016 სამეცნიერო სტატია мақолаи илмӣ videnskabelig artikel 2016年の論文 articol științific научни чланак 2016年論文 vitskapeleg artikkel artículo científico publicado en 2016 vědecký článek 2016年论文 2016年論文 บทความทางวิทยาศาสตร์ 2016年论文 wissenschaftlicher Artikel научни чланак scientific article published on 31 May 2016 научная статья 2016年論文 artikulong pang-agham scientific article published on 31 May 2016 vitenskapelig artikkel vetenskaplig artikel 2016년 논문 artikel ilmiah ৩১ মে ২০১৬-এ প্রকাশিত বৈজ্ঞানিক নিবন্ধ наукова стаття, опублікована в травні 2016 2016年論文 מאמר מדעי 2016年论文 articolo scientifico artículu científicu espublizáu en 2016 teaduslik artikkel tieteellinen artikkeli scienca artikolo bilimsel makale article scientifique artigo científico 2016年论文 научна статия artykuł naukowy artikull shkencor 2016年论文 vedecký článok επιστημονικό άρθρο
p:P577
wds:Q39193789-D4E5D02D-41DB-4A4C-BC38-DA9307152FCC
wdt:P577
2016-05-31T00:00:00Z
p:P2888
wds:Q39193789-ED89C7A5-AD72-4818-83E1-7E3BD975ABB7
wdt:P2888
n12:s00586-016-4631-0
p:P2860
wds:Q39193789-40CC8511-3832-48F1-BC1B-77B12C02A5CB wds:Q39193789-64F180E5-0A6B-4C8D-AC09-DBDA63EA78F9 wds:Q39193789-5E2869C6-A1C4-49AC-96CB-5AE6337A07CA wds:Q39193789-2734698E-1C2E-4804-B51E-059FDFDE8486 wds:Q39193789-26F8591D-2EC6-4487-B334-4A3DD34586E0 wds:Q39193789-36499067-F106-4B6A-8FE8-5AE5DCEE30D3 wds:Q39193789-352FF5C4-40C8-4C4F-8046-577DC37B6F52 wds:Q39193789-17DE5DD6-4449-4FB8-8727-952DC3EBDBC3 wds:Q39193789-1441E1D5-BA4A-4471-9E60-F9E492A3FE2B wds:Q39193789-25F84392-8442-456F-A3F6-91A680136FD8 wds:Q39193789-1C229E78-89BA-4B7A-84F2-28A74FF37846 wds:Q39193789-FB12C5FD-1251-4907-B71F-937B7EEDB345 wds:Q39193789-F8E047F6-7A0F-47A3-9BC9-D9DA41AAD273 wds:Q39193789-CC86393E-2DE9-4AEC-A675-E0EDD58E064F wds:Q39193789-A7EBDF34-3E53-417F-B669-F25019E6F31F wds:Q39193789-7A3FA8EF-DE89-4A25-A76C-4FA703FAA41F wds:Q39193789-8CA5268C-5BBB-47AD-B1F9-336C4A9A1921
wdt:P2860
wd:Q30883288 wd:Q85170003 wd:Q83874390 wd:Q78883417 wd:Q83186580 wd:Q41130924 wd:Q43668627 wd:Q48021066 wd:Q53319765 wd:Q77847465 wd:Q70636500 wd:Q77403834 wd:Q74633566 wd:Q50136367 wd:Q40592667 wd:Q40922554 wd:Q39205137
p:P2093
wds:Q39193789-B97A3A87-C2DC-4995-AAE3-8342E5EA3D21 wds:Q39193789-F19A41BB-B7F6-4ACE-85B5-FEA36053C0D7 wds:Q39193789-AEFA60FF-1892-4663-9309-A7380DCE4CEB wds:Q39193789-372BB23C-8132-4061-B2BC-54A7E8A66993
wdt:P2093
Weerasak Singhatanadgige Panya Luksanapruksa Lukas P Zebala K Daniel Riew
rdfs:label
Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3? Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3? Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3?
skos:prefLabel
Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3? Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3? Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3?
schema:name
Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3? Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3? Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3?
p:P1476
wds:Q39193789-A82301BC-A36A-4031-8330-E28867E63F3C
wdt:P1476
Can standard anterior Smith-Robinson supramanubrial approach be utilized for approach down to T2 or T3?
p:P31
wds:Q39193789-B41E93A8-7AE0-4929-B19F-88842A506C55
wdt:P31
wd:Q13442814
p:P698
wds:Q39193789-F6328827-C4D6-4288-9D91-F8536BD9B855
wdtn:P698
n11:27246350
wdt:P698
27246350
p:P1433
wds:Q39193789-92654C85-8E97-49DC-A5A3-05755D8CEEBF
wdt:P1433
wd:Q15763992
p:P356
wds:Q39193789-78765125-03C9-47C6-846B-961E51F5A18D
wdtn:P356
n10:S00586-016-4631-0
wdt:P356
10.1007/S00586-016-4631-0