About: Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : wikibase:Item, within Data Space : wikidata.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

scholarly article by Elizabeth J Robinson et al published February 2004 in Social Science and Medicine

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Item
description	wetenschappelijk artikel (nl) article scientifique publié en 2004 (fr) наукова стаття, опублікована в лютому 2004 (uk) im Februar 2004 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel (de) scholarly article by Elizabeth J Robinson et al published February 2004 in Social Science and Medicine (en)
publication date	wds:Q57711732-B9818ABF-8408-4EBF-9EE1-564B7819C8A0
publication date	2004-02-01 00:00:00Z (xsd:dateTime)
language of work or name	wds:Q57711732-22F069E3-DD9D-43C0-B90A-85FFBD334E84
language of work or name	English
cites work	wds:Q57711732-10B72AE8-B32B-4526-AE37-3A25BD21A246 wds:Q57711732-11CDD394-5E00-4610-A972-AAEA4FD1281D wds:Q57711732-1733D60D-F56B-4EBA-91BA-44C3EC8A6C52 wds:Q57711732-2468378A-78C9-48D8-8AF4-4F8BE7FFA05E wds:Q57711732-3AAC78A4-3F24-4746-8EF0-6C14EEE24338 wds:Q57711732-3EAAA9AB-C46C-4F48-9ADC-59015159A098 wds:Q57711732-744C84B4-F959-4D0F-9D7D-7B7258DBF7D9 wds:Q57711732-81D6B139-662E-4626-8F66-71D8E72B9E5B wds:Q57711732-87150F09-A60B-447E-9514-62D06950E2F7 wds:Q57711732-98A1FEE2-2520-4477-8CD3-4A70AC41DBD1 wds:Q57711732-9AE68260-197D-483C-89B0-DAE489EF5FE6 wds:Q57711732-A37D4010-1615-4CDE-B8B0-BFE70F12141C wds:Q57711732-A4C04D6F-91F0-4F28-BF45-E99E73D0524B wds:Q57711732-AEF51074-020E-4C91-86C9-B13454609390 wds:Q57711732-EAFB93A4-B6CA-4B5D-AFF8-436DD184D018 wds:Q57711732-F6430951-E020-4D1D-9B56-1F631761C5CE wds:Q57711732-FCBCB086-661B-4CAC-8B05-0C144EB7D57C
cites work	Information and communication in the context of a clinical trial Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable? At what level of collective equipoise does a clinical trial become ethical? Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms "Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?" The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial Equipoise as a means of managing uncertainty: personal, communal and proxy Adaptive designs, informed consent, and the ethics of research Focus group interviews examining attitudes to randomised trials among breast cancer patients and the general community Who's afraid of the randomised controlled trial? Parents' views of an SLT research study Investigating pediatric HIV research ethics in the field Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice Shortcomings of the randomized controlled trial: a view from the boondocks
author name string	wds:Q57711732-297F0AC5-BB09-4C59-BF43-BB9A6D6B1CE7 wds:Q57711732-47F878D1-989C-4A6D-8ABB-21C319934E5B wds:Q57711732-72205369-892A-4008-BE04-D1A7E0F7790A wds:Q57711732-C5E5A950-7B42-49ED-BFB9-580FC155E04F wds:Q57711732-CB190714-689F-46C3-B488-4D53B62E13C2 wds:Q57711732-E6F64EFA-AB67-4F97-ABB9-2A3B3E251B56
author name string	Richard Lilford Andrew Stevens Sarah Edwards David Braunholtz Cicely Kerr Elizabeth J Robinson
rdfs:label	Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials (en) Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials (nl)
skos:prefLabel	Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials (en) Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials (nl)
name	Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials (en) Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials (nl)
author	wds:Q57711732-A30FA340-20B4-4FFE-B422-42F0499EB989 wds:Q57711732-FAA4C0B0-0A9E-454D-A39E-0628CB4C045A
author	Cicely Kerr Andrew J Stevens
title	wds:Q57711732-05BB8EB5-B3F4-4365-929E-F1959BB57E68
title	Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials (en)
page(s)	wds:Q57711732-0E91E5BB-92CC-4D26-B890-F64A81E5B813 wds:Q57711732-8C3E3476-01D7-4DFE-B60E-2D65A9DEC84A
page(s)	811-24 811-824
instance of	wds:Q57711732-8E868FAC-18C1-416F-A3AC-5028C5F597BE
instance of	scholarly article
main subject	wds:Q57711732-24A1B966-FE63-49A7-B616-2B0F74DA4724
main subject	medical ethics
PubMed ID	wds:Q57711732-FFC22E61-E8DE-4DB1-93DB-A9AC977CDAEA
PubMed ID	http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/reference/14672595
PubMed ID	14672595
published in	wds:Q57711732-33F22880-DFE1-447F-ADD6-5568D69B19A9
published in	Social Science and Medicine
issue	wds:Q57711732-5BA638AB-9CFD-45C5-9D47-A3F3614DFC31
volume	wds:Q57711732-A5A95E3D-755D-434F-93B0-C9EF2805541D
issue	4
volume	58
DOI	wds:Q57711732-28D5AA21-D560-410F-BF13-099BAE21B241
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00255-7
DOI	10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00255-7
is owl:sameAs of	Lay conceptions of the ethical and scientific justifications for random allocation in clinical trials
is about of	https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityData/Q57711732
is cites work of	Patients' perceptions of research in emergency settings: a study of survivors of sudden cardiac death Patient advocacy and patient centredness in participant recruitment to randomized-controlled trials: implications for informed consent Improving understanding of clinical trial procedures among low literacy populations: an intervention within a microbicide trial in Malawi. The Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE, CRUK/ Participatory Research: A Way to Reduce Vulnerability Effects of Study Design and Allocation on participant behaviour--ESDA: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Reasons for participation and non-participation in a randomized controlled trial: postal questionnaire surveys of women eligible for TOMBOLA (Trial Of Management of Borderline and Other Low-Grade Abnormal smears). The preferences of 600 patients for different descriptions of randomisation Is "rescue" therapy ethical in randomized controlled trials? Participants’ perspectives on safety monitoring in clinical trials

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.117 as of May 05 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3239 as of May 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-centos_6-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 190 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software