About: Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : wikibase:Item, within Data Space : wikidata.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

scientific article published on July 2010

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Item
description	videnskabelig artikel (da) article científic (ca) articolo scientifico (it) artigo científico (pt) bilimsel makale (tr) vedecký článok (sk) vetenskaplig artikel (sv) vědecký článek (cs) wetenschappelijk artikel (nl) wissenschaftlicher Artikel (de) научни чланак (sr) article scientifique (fr) artículu científicu espublizáu en 2010 (ast) наукова стаття, опублікована в липні 2010 (uk) مقالة علمية نشرت في يوليو 2010 (ar) scientific article published on July 2010 (en)
publication date	wds:Q37768242-FD816106-F167-4C45-BC25-7E69019C5058
publication date	2010-07-01 00:00:00Z (xsd:dateTime)
language of work or name	wds:Q37768242-AB195BCE-80DB-4BDB-88A9-73A2A2BB73DF
language of work or name	English
cites work	wds:Q37768242-2D60F2D8-E205-4846-96F1-6EB0E77ECC5D wds:Q37768242-570D2AFE-05D9-4BFF-A737-E8D09D2C954C wds:Q37768242-6131302C-1707-41B0-8316-2D59AF80E81A wds:Q37768242-917A84C4-6189-4739-AD6C-E204288B269F wds:Q37768242-9E00B0B9-040A-497A-9C54-4AE1E7366C06 wds:Q37768242-A075E574-9E6E-4B3A-9D1D-882D6C699DC9 wds:Q37768242-C7D84088-1099-4479-8E2D-CC1C6812491C wds:Q37768242-D1BEDA3A-42FB-4709-9974-B247055D66DE wds:Q37768242-D4C06928-58F6-4D61-A25D-ECE06C49FAF6 wds:Q37768242-DC5EE69F-D3E5-408E-9DF2-1720987499EF wds:Q37768242-FBFB4911-050F-4413-ABFD-C9FD38CF86DF wds:Q37768242-FF68F5A4-888A-4D19-87E3-B9EFF57D1CF4
cites work	The challenges of searching for and retrieving qualitative studies How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics? An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study Patients and professionals as research partners: Challenges, practicalities, and benefits Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs. Virtual community consultation? Using the literature and weblogs to link community perspectives and health technology assessment
author name string	wds:Q37768242-19925460-5900-4F90-80AE-9FB703C1CCFA wds:Q37768242-33E4B53D-D057-4E5E-96E0-237F8EBCC0DE wds:Q37768242-5352D2C5-AA90-4C34-8493-EC6BF2ED2BAB wds:Q37768242-8B965BD1-42BB-4A4A-B05C-8628CBC9B812 wds:Q37768242-966C674D-7A03-440D-87E0-E7070D1604D4 wds:Q37768242-A0E02F30-1BFE-4CBC-9AFF-42E11F620455
author name string	Helle Ploug Hansen Karen Facey Javier Gracia Jean Mossman Alessandra Lo Scalzo Ann Single
rdfs:label	Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (en) Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (nl) Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (ast)
skos:prefLabel	Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (en) Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (nl) Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (ast)
name	Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (en) Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (nl) Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (ast)
author	wds:Q37768242-13DE24A5-1253-4457-B1DD-77F20B863590
author	Antoine Boivin
title	wds:Q37768242-C5E66C51-F076-4171-BE36-760FDFB7E77C
title	Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation (en)
page(s)	wds:Q37768242-3DF6FDA3-2B71-42AA-A892-8F846E6DAA4D
page(s)	334-340
instance of	wds:Q37768242-DBFADAD4-4648-4889-B1AE-F9E8A4DF3DBB wds:Q37768242-f95fe577-ab2b-4c9d-a324-ed7b0de21936
instance of	review article scholarly article
main subject	wds:Q37768242-F49F841B-F0F8-448A-90B0-2F3F34A53A13
main subject	Patients
PubMed ID	wds:Q37768242-A873F04C-8868-42ED-A1EB-7CA41DA06C0A
PubMed ID	http://rdf.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubchem/reference/20584364
PubMed ID	20584364
published in	wds:Q37768242-C24701CE-EA00-4067-A8C9-570351832E16
published in	International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
issue	wds:Q37768242-E883C8B3-5C4D-4184-BA74-B52ED1E1C259
volume	wds:Q37768242-0778DFE7-B0C9-49F4-BB63-1DC98F5AE41C
issue	3
volume	26
DOI	wds:Q37768242-EE6A67A4-21C0-4FA2-A5DF-85CC238A5569
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266462310000395
DOI	10.1017/S0266462310000395
is about of	https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:EntityData/Q37768242
is cites work of	The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research "Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the method Primary extraosseous Ewing sarcoma of the lung in children What are the barriers and facilitators to exercise and physical activity uptake and adherence among South Asian older adults: a systematic review of qualitative studies Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences Methods of synthesizing qualitative research studies for health technology assessment. It's not evidence, it's insight: bringing patients' perspectives into health technology appraisal at NICE. SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial Finding Qualitative Research Evidence for Health Technology Assessment

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.117 as of May 05 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3239 as of May 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-centos_6-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 188 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software