Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
description
| - videnskabelig artikel (da)
- article científic (ca)
- articolo scientifico (it)
- artigo científico (pt)
- bilimsel makale (tr)
- vedecký článok (sk)
- vetenskaplig artikel (sv)
- vědecký článek (cs)
- wetenschappelijk artikel (nl)
- wissenschaftlicher Artikel (de)
- научни чланак (sr)
- article scientifique (fr)
- artículu científicu espublizáu en 2009 (ast)
- наукова стаття, опублікована в червні 2009 (uk)
- scientific article published on 21 June 2009 (en)
- مقالة علمية نشرت في 21 يونيو 2009 (ar)
|
publication date
| |
publication date
| |
author name string
| |
author name string
| - Stephanie Chang
- Michelle Eder
- Nicole Floyd
- Sarah A Lopez
|
rdfs:label
| - AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (en)
- AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (nl)
- AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (ast)
|
skos:prefLabel
| - AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (en)
- AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (nl)
- AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (ast)
|
name
| - AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (en)
- AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (nl)
- AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (ast)
|
author
| |
author
| |
title
| |
title
| - AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program (en)
|
page(s)
| |
page(s)
| |
instance of
| |
instance of
| |
main subject
| |
main subject
| |
PubMed ID
| |
PubMed ID
| |
PubMed ID
| |
published in
| |
published in
| |
issue
| |
volume
| |
issue
| |
volume
| |
DOI
| |
DOI
| |
DOI
| - 10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2009.03.008
|
ResearchGate publication ID
| |
ResearchGate publication ID
| |
is about
of | |
is cites work
of | - Setting priorities for comparative effectiveness research on management of primary angle closure: a survey of Asia-Pacific clinicians
- Preventive pharmacologic treatments for episodic migraine in adults
- What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities
- Toward modernizing the systematic review pipeline in genetics: efficient updating via data mining
- Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments
- Identification of topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews in the field of cancer imaging
- Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute
- Prioritizing Comparative-Effectiveness Research Topics via Stakeholder Involvement: An Application in COPD
- A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research
- Prioritizing comparative effectiveness research for cancer diagnostics using a regional stakeholder approach
- Debunking myths of protocol registration
- Chapter 2: medical tests guidance (2) developing the topic and structuring systematic reviews of medical tests: utility of PICOTS, analytic frameworks, decision trees, and other frameworks
- Unresolved tensions in consumer engagement in CER: a US research perspective
- Chronic venous leg ulcer treatment: future research needs
- The emergence of diagnostic imaging technologies in breast cancer: discovery, regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption in clinical guidelines
- Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned
- An analytical framework for delirium research in palliative care settings: integrated epidemiologic, clinician-researcher, and knowledge user perspectives
- Evaluating the Homeostasis Assessment Model Insulin Resistance and the Cardiac Autonomic System in Bariatric Surgery Patients: A Meta-Analysis.
- Qualitative Exploration of Engaging Patients as Advisors in a Program of Evidence Synthesis: Cobuilding the Science to Enhance Impact
- Getting our priorities straight: a novel framework for stakeholder-informed prioritization of cancer genomics research
- Appropriate Use Criteria for Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis in the United States
- Two methods provide similar signals for the need to update systematic reviews
- Prioritizing research needs based on a systematic evidence review: a pilot process for engaging stakeholders
- Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Physical Symptoms Among Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: A Systematic Review.
- Engaging Patient Advocates and Other Stakeholders to Design Measures of Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care.
- Addressing multimorbidity in evidence integration and synthesis
- Facilitation of risk assessment with evidence-based methods - A framework for use of systematic mapping and systematic reviews in determining hazard, developing toxicity values, and characterizing uncertainty
- Episodic migraines in children: limited evidence on preventive pharmacological treatments.
- Missing and accounted for: gaps and areas of wealth in the public health review literature
- Identifying Research Gaps and Prioritizing Psychological Health Evidence Synthesis Needs
- Querying stakeholders to inform comparative effectiveness research
- Comparative effectiveness topics from a large, integrated delivery system
- Research Gaps in Wilderness Medicine
- Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews.
|
is cites work
of | |