About: A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : wikibase:Item, within Data Space : wikidata.demo.openlinksw.com associated with source document(s)

scientific article published on 01 February 1992

AttributesValues
rdf:type
description
  • wetenschappelijk artikel (nl)
  • наукова стаття, опублікована в лютому 1992 (uk)
  • article scientifique publié en 1992 (fr)
  • im Februar 1992 veröffentlichter wissenschaftlicher Artikel (de)
  • artículu científicu espublizáu en febreru de 1992 (ast)
  • artikull shkencor i botuar më 01 shkurt 1992 (sq)
  • scientific article published on 01 February 1992 (en)
publication date
publication date
exact match
exact match
cites work
cites work
author name string
author name string
  • D F Smith
  • J C Garrelts
  • D Ast
  • J D Peterie
rdfs:label
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (en)
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (nl)
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (sq)
skos:prefLabel
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (en)
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (nl)
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (sq)
name
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (en)
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (nl)
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (sq)
title
title
  • A comparison of the safety, timing and cost-effectiveness of administering antibiotics by intravenous bolus (push) versus intravenous piggyback (slow infusion) in surgical prophylaxis (en)
page(s)
page(s)
  • 116-123
instance of
instance of
PubMed ID
PubMed ID
PubMed ID
  • 10172048
published in
published in
issue
volume
issue
  • 2
volume
  • 1
DOI
DOI
DOI
  • 10.2165/00019053-199201020-00008
Dimensions Publication ID
Dimensions Publication ID
  • 1012662350
is about of
is cites work of
is cites work of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.117 as of May 05 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3239 as of May 5 2024, on Linux (x86_64-centos_6-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 180 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software